Archive for the 9/11 Truth or Consequences? category
January 17th, 2010
For files.
1. German magazine publishes a general blast at the official story: “We Do Not Believe You!”
Recall that the German Defense Minister, Andreas von Bulow, stated loudly soon after the attacks that they were in some fashion an inside job, thinking it seems of Mossadist influence working within the western agencies to nurture and clear the way for the misison (a guess that I continue to think is worth keeping in mind, against, some day distant, the appearance of evidence).
2. Cass Sunstein, Obama’s appointee to run the Ministry of Truth, advocates (in 2008) infiltration of Conspiracy groups as a means of turning off the message.
November 1st, 2009
Something to chew on came my way at lunch circa 2006:
Time is Precious. But Truth is More Precious than Time.
Wow. Alas.
The Man’s too much …
Aw hell …
October 16th, 2009
MUST WATCH, unfortunately …
M
M
9/11, the unwarranted influence of the military-industrial complex, and what 50 years of same has done to American society.
Here’s Part One at youtube.
The other nine are there too. About 100 minutes total.
Can buy a copy here.
The producers include Wim Wenders — a fave.
Most of what the film has to say is familiar. But the last two parts (on youtube) have revived basic despair about not only our owner-operator class but the young soldiers, who seem as alien and rabid as the teen zealots of 1917 did to so many Russians.
It’s only a few baby steps from shooting civilians for fun in Iraq to the same in American cities. I guess we will see this sooner than later, perhaps even before election day 2016 if Romney beats Obama in 2012.
And of course I don’t mean to imply that it’s okay in Iraq. It’s so NOT okay that … words elude.
And thoughts of leaving the country intrude.
I mean only to gauge the degradation of our people — our enemy met that is us — raised on video games and patriotic television. We mirror the owner-operators with gruesome fidelity.
And have deprived ourselves of sound basis for complaint should one day a city of our own go up in smoke.
October 6th, 2009
M
M
Engineer friend Eric Douglas, who penned a definitive rejection of the National Institute of Standards & Techonology’s best-guess-within-prescribed-limits as to how/why the Twin Towers collapsed on 9/11/01 …
Yes, that Eric Douglas writes that he has received a lot of photos from NIST under an FOIA request, and supplies this link thereto.
NIST was the federal agency tasked to explain the exceedingly odd collapses of 9/11. Eric’s December 2006 critique of their report on WTC 1 and 2 (the towers) may be found at the Journal for 9/11 Studies.
In a nutshell:
– NIST did not address the question: How did the towers collapse?
Rather: What’s the best Likely Story that may be assembled as to how an airliner strike could cause a Twin Tower collapse?
– NIST did not “substantiate its conclusions experimentally. On the contrary, many of NIST’s tests contradicted its conclusions …”
– “There are several examples where NIST chose to manipulate input data, and then certify its findings based on inevitable conclusions that derive from the manipulated data.”
– “There were also flaws in NIST’s computer simulations …”
And more.
After dismantling the NIST positive argument, such as it is, Eric then appends a long list of items of evidence that contradict that positive argument.
Masterfully done. And Eric, of course, is not alone.
Everybody should read his analysis — and then think again about current arguments for escalating the apparently Aimless war in Pakghanistan.
Here’s a small seleciton of the photos.
M
April 19th, 2009
The momentum seems to be growing, not diminishing, at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Some six hundred engineers and architects, led by Richard Gage, of the American Institute of Architecture.
They put out a two-hour film last year. Conclusion: Demolition of WTC 1, 2 and 7 beyond a reasonable doubt. Here’s the trailer:
People able to believe their eyes.
Obama would be risking his life and administration to open a 9/11 investigation. The Congress should do it.  But Congress … is dead.
April 11th, 2009
From the Spring 2009 issue of a two-year old but peer-reviewed online chemistry journal. The authors include Kevin Ryan and Steve Jones, the engineer and physicist (who announced other thermite results 2 years or so ago) behind the 9/11 Online Journal.
I guess they pub’d this here instead for the peer certification. I hope the latter is genuine.
But all that aside, yes, bleed and peep, read and weep.
It’s hard to tolerate Obama’s concession of the National Security Apparat’s program in Afghanistan when the world knows that our invasion there was on the books by midsummer 2001 and that what happened on 9/11 is not what the MM say happened.
Most of this happened before, when JFK was shot. It’s happening again.
February 9th, 2009
It will be interesting to see if the steel skeleton of this 34-floor tower entirely engulfed by flames suffers or collapses in anything like the fashion of the Twin Towers or WTC 7 on September 11, 2001.
And the answer is …?
No. Not even close. Nothing like. (The kink in the building was there by design.) More photos.
The steel neither melted nor weakened sufficiently to cause collapse of any sort — just like all the other burnt steel skyscrapers in history, except the three that collapsed neatly on 9/11/01.
One report says a big explosion also rocked the building — captured in this photo, perhaps.
Let’s see what the experts say …
January 17th, 2009
Interesting that the Pentagon asked the President.
Congress (the people’s house)? Apparently none of their damned business.
